Representative queries
Agree on questions related to your offer, buying decisions and provider comparisons.
GEO + AEO with SEO foundations
Assess queries, mentions and sources to identify visibility opportunities through a documented approach.
Request an assessmentAI answers can vary by question, time, country and session context. Rather than treating a single response as a definitive result, we define a sample of relevant queries and record what we observe. GEO and AEO are considered alongside SEO foundations, content clarity and consistent information about your business.
The final scope is tailored to your website and objectives.
Agree on questions related to your offer, buying decisions and provider comparisons.
Record date, engine, queries and context. Observe mentions and citations where the system provides them.
Review entity clarity, business information, useful content and observable sources.
Identify relevant improvements and define how observations will be repeated under recorded conditions.
We do not guarantee mentions or citations from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or any other system. Special files or markup are not presented as universal requirements for AI visibility.
One strategy. Two ways to put it into action.
Advice and implementation are clearly separated in the proposal. You know what will be delivered and who owns each change.
An assessment, strategy and prioritised recommendations for your team to implement. We define objectives, ownership and validation criteria.
Alongside the plan, we carry out the agreed optimisations. Scope, access, testing and milestones are documented before the work starts.
What we measure
Observed presence across an agreed query set, cited sources and identifiable referral visits where evidence is available. A sample is not market share, and changing answers alone do not establish attributable sales.
SEO addresses search engine visibility. GEO concerns generative search experiences, while AEO concerns direct answers. Their foundations overlap, so we integrate them without duplicating services.
No. We assess observed visibility and improvement opportunities, but each system controls its answers and sources.
Useful, clear, accessible information and a sound technical foundation remain relevant. AI visibility assessment complements SEO rather than replacing it.
GEO and AEO
GEO and AEO build on SEO foundations while examining how information is retrieved, described and cited in generated answers.
Develop a repeatable set of questions by service, language and buying situation. These are not claimed to be actual private user prompts.
Record brand mentions, cited pages and description accuracy. One mention does not establish a stable ranking.
Review indexable content, direct answers, entity clarity and verifiable public sources without artificial markup.
Compare observations over time and available supported tools. A citation is neither a sale nor a search ranking.
We cannot control what external assistants say, but we can examine the information they use and recommend improvements.
Agree on services, languages, problems and buyer comparisons.
Record responses, dates, sources and differences across platforms where repeatable.
Improve clear answers, evidence, editorial structure and useful internal links.
Repeat the checks alongside organic visibility and valid enquiries without assuming causality.
Straight answers to support a confident decision.
No. No agency can guarantee answers generated by independent assistants. We can improve accessible information and document observed mentions.
No universal special file guarantees AI inclusion. We prioritize accessibility, helpful content, verifiable information and SEO foundations.
SEO concerns organic search, GEO examines generative experiences, and AEO focuses on useful direct answers. They overlap and do not always need separate pages or contracts.
Share your website, your goals and the markets you serve. We will review the context to define a suitable proposal.