Crawling and indexing
Page status, canonicals and redirects. Check concrete signals before recommending a change.
A clearly scoped assessment
An evidence-led SEO audit with clear priorities and a roadmap for better decisions.
Request an assessmentLow visibility or few enquiries do not automatically prove a technical problem. We investigate potential obstacles and distinguish confirmed errors, opportunities and questions that need more data. That gives your team a clearer basis for allocating resources.
The final scope is tailored to your website and objectives.
Page status, canonicals and redirects. Check concrete signals before recommending a change.
Page purpose, duplication, metadata, content and internal links.
Mobile usability, resource loading and friction in the enquiry journey.
Measurement quality and relevant comparisons with service pages. No invented search volumes or rankings.
The number of websites, URLs, languages and depth of analysis are agreed before quoting. The audit provides diagnosis and recommendations; implementation is scoped separately or explicitly included in a combined proposal.
One strategy. Two ways to put it into action.
Advice and implementation are clearly separated in the proposal. You know what will be delivered and who owns each change.
An assessment, strategy and prioritised recommendations for your team to implement. We define objectives, ownership and validation criteria.
Alongside the plan, we carry out the agreed optimisations. Scope, access, testing and milestones are documented before the work starts.
What we measure
Confirmed findings, prioritised recommendations and validation of fixes where implementation is contracted. Delivering an audit is not the same as achieving traffic or sales improvements.
The audit is a diagnostic engagement. We can quote implementation afterwards or scope both parts at the start.
It depends on the scope. Search Console and analytics, where available, help validate findings. Access and permissions are agreed before work begins.
Fees depend on site size, languages and depth of analysis. We review your context and provide a proposal with a defined scope.
Evidence-led audit
A useful audit separates confirmed errors, risks and opportunities instead of treating every automated warning as a proven problem.
Check URL responses, robots.txt, sitemaps, redirects, robots directives, canonical tags and critical resources.
Review titles, headings, primary intent, overlapping pages, internal links and query-to-page alignment.
Evaluate offer clarity, enquiry links, forms, confirmation flows and friction on mobile and desktop.
Check Spanish/English page relationships, reciprocal hreflang and markup matching visible content.
The output should support decisions, not just provide a long list of warnings.
Each observation identifies the affected URL, evidence and confidence level.
Separate critical blockers from content, conversion and longer-term opportunities.
Explain the recommended fix and how to verify it.
Your team can execute the report or request an implementation proposal.
Straight answers to support a confident decision.
No. It identifies verified issues and opportunities; results depend on competition, implementation and search systems.
Yes. Technical and commercial foundations can be checked even before useful performance data appears.
We validate alerts against the real site, business intent and available evidence before recommending changes.
Share your website, your goals and the markets you serve. We will review the context to define a suitable proposal.